ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Constructing Regions Inside the Nation

Economic and Social Structure of Space in Agrarian and Cultural Regions

When the nation or the “centre” and their relations with constituent states are challenged by forces that are neither disciplined nor stabilised inside national territories, then economic regions expand and challenge the capacities of states to regulate them. This paper presents insights gained from new maps of India’s material and cultural regions, manifestations of the spatial patterns of Indian capitalism. Specifically, the focus is on regions of agrarian structure (rent, petty production, and capitalist production and exchange relations) and regions of social identity (caste, ethnicity, and gender).

This paper has been developed from an earlier draft presented at the Azim Premji University–Institute for New Economic Thinking conference on Regional Political Economy in 2016 with thanks to the organisers and discussants. An extended, multi-authored treatment of the arguments here is in E Basile, B Harriss-White and C Lutringer (eds), 2015, especially the chapters by Mishra and Harriss-White, Palmer-Jones and Sen, Raju, and Vidyarthee—together with Lerche (2015), all of whose work I acknowledge with great gratitude.

The foundations of modern geography included the study of the relations between physical landscape and human activity, of the constant tension in theory and practice between the universal on the one hand and the particular, contextual and idiographic on the other, together with the study of the world’s regions (Chapman 2007; Spate et al 1967). Almost everywhere, these foundations have been undermined by the discipline at a moment of history when the persistence and diversity of regions generate tensions between the forms of their economic integration and their politics. For when the nation or the “centre” (be it New Delhi or Brussels) and their relations with constituent states are challenged by forces that are neither disciplined nor stabilised inside national territories, then economic regions expand and challenge the capacities of states to regulate them. At the same time, political aspirations for autonomy tend to work in the opposite direction. Yet, political regions are evidently not the only spatial units through which development takes place.

Rehabilitating the Region, Going against the Grain

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).

Pay INR 50.00

(Readers in India)

Pay $ 6.00

(Readers outside India)

Updated On : 17th Nov, 2017
Back to Top